iopgsm.blogg.se

Closing wheels comparison
Closing wheels comparison




closing wheels comparison

Practical Farm Research (PFR)® is a registered trademark of Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. Curventine™ is a trademark of Dawn Equipment Company. To view more studies from the 2016 PFR book, click here. In evaluating agronomic practices and input products, not comparing seed products, Beck’s PFR aims to help farmers maximize their input dollars and increase their bottom line. More than 110 different studies were conducted in 2016, comparing over 150 products across multiple locations to learn how different management practices and new technologies perform in field environments. The reviews of its inner-shoulder maximizing seed-soil-contact looked to make it. Consult Beck’s PFR or your trusted advisor to determine which closing wheel might be right for your farm.īeck’s PFR is the largest source of unbiased, cutting-edge agronomic information in the industry. Our Germinator closing wheels worked great, conventional and no-till. So what’s the take home message? Alternative closing wheel setups consistently outperform two solid rubber closing wheels. Iowa | 2 Dawn Curventine™ | +4.1 Bu./A.Ohio | 1 Dawn Curventine™ and 1 Solid | +2.7 Bu./A.Kentucky | 2 SI Distributing Finger-Till Wheels yielded the same as 1 Martin Spade and 1 Solid | +5.8 Bu./A.Indiana | 2 Copperhead Ag Furrow Cruisers | +6.6 Bu./A.The winners at each site for 2016 include:

closing wheels comparison

Knowing that, different closing wheel systems were tested at each of the four sites to determine which were the most successful for their soils. Markets Analysis Back to Markets Analysisīeck’s PFR understands that soil types vary greatly across geographies.






Closing wheels comparison